A note unrelated to this post - Not sure if you saw this but one pundit did a post where he mentions you and egalitarianism. He was apparently exposed to your perspective after your post on 'real left' (he himself often posts on 'real left') https://plagueonbothhouses.substack.com/p/the-idiots-guide-to-a-class-analysis
Thank you very much for calling this to my attention. I had not been aware of Rusere Shoniwa and his post mentioning me before. He seems like a very thoughtful person.
John, I opened the link to the Time magazine article and it said this, "A staggering $50 trillion. That is how much the upward redistribution of income has cost American workers over the past several decades."
I remember the day before 9/11 Donald Rumsfeld, as Defense Secretary , reported that some multi-billions could not be accounted for from the Defense budget, presumably going into the deep state black hole of corruption and omniwar against the people and other nations.
But $50 trillion is a staggering sum and this issue alone should give the majority of people reason to ditch the rich. I am an egalitarian so we can get justice for actual state crimes like JFK and the other 60's assassinations, and for 9/11 and for the Federal Covid program, a Department of Defense deep state operation against the people. And, I am egalitarian so we can be free from plutocracy, but my indignation at the state crimes really drives me in my activism.
What is it going to take to make clear that we the people are dirt to the plutocracy? $50 trillion over a couple of generations seems like reason enough. Why didn't Jill Stein from the Green Party make a bigger deal with this?
The entire point of research into globalism and war is to be able to perceive the patterns, identify the weaknesses and vulnerabilities, and then bring the manipulators down, which would finally put us in a position to establish a democratic state in which national wealth is egalitarianly distributed. For the sceptics, Australia was just such a nation from 1948 to 1976; a happy cirsumstance that was ground into free trade oblivion following the US coup d'etet of 1975. Today, 3 million Australians are homeless and 60% live in poverty.
Having commenced my research in 1964, I was able to see what is now hidden to most. From1815, the Rothschilds prospered by lending to both sides in wars they fomented. In 1932, fellow Zionist Nelson Rockefeller suggested a multi-pronged attack. Thus, from 1933 to 1938, he designed the entire United Nations, the HQ of which ended up on his family's land in New York. The Zionists then proceeded to invade sovereign nations under the US flag, plunder their resources, avoid compensation by converting residents into refugees, who then invaded adjoining counties thereby diluting their sentiments of national sovereignty, and creating division and conflict. The US imposed the policy of Multiculturalism to lubricate the process.
Under this multilateral strategy, the US invaded 61 nations and confiscated their human and natural resources, thereby "making the US great". As was shown in a 1969 US study, with 10% of the world's population they consumed 80% of the world's resources. Donald Duck could have made the US great by applying this equation. Donald Trump intends to do the same.
The equation has weaknesses, which are in their application, and that is where a global cell movement has been forming for some decades now and, apparently has already made its first strike. That is all I know about this ultra-secret movement. Globally, according to Jeffrey Sachs, 93% condemn Israel and its US funder. It seems that Wagner-backed Sahel Nations will eventually establish an Africa/South Asia-Pacific/Latin America realm of influence that will, conjoined with BRICS nations, be impermeable to Wall Street/City of London/BIS influence. That is the eventual cause of death of the West, according to Cell pundits.
A note unrelated to this post - Not sure if you saw this but one pundit did a post where he mentions you and egalitarianism. He was apparently exposed to your perspective after your post on 'real left' (he himself often posts on 'real left') https://plagueonbothhouses.substack.com/p/the-idiots-guide-to-a-class-analysis
Thank you very much for calling this to my attention. I had not been aware of Rusere Shoniwa and his post mentioning me before. He seems like a very thoughtful person.
John, I opened the link to the Time magazine article and it said this, "A staggering $50 trillion. That is how much the upward redistribution of income has cost American workers over the past several decades."
I remember the day before 9/11 Donald Rumsfeld, as Defense Secretary , reported that some multi-billions could not be accounted for from the Defense budget, presumably going into the deep state black hole of corruption and omniwar against the people and other nations.
But $50 trillion is a staggering sum and this issue alone should give the majority of people reason to ditch the rich. I am an egalitarian so we can get justice for actual state crimes like JFK and the other 60's assassinations, and for 9/11 and for the Federal Covid program, a Department of Defense deep state operation against the people. And, I am egalitarian so we can be free from plutocracy, but my indignation at the state crimes really drives me in my activism.
What is it going to take to make clear that we the people are dirt to the plutocracy? $50 trillion over a couple of generations seems like reason enough. Why didn't Jill Stein from the Green Party make a bigger deal with this?
Excellent question re Jill Stein. Fear of actually challenging the power of the plutocracy is my guess.
She is, after all, a designated target She has now learned to keep her head down at the parapet.
As someone once said... "Context is everything".
The entire point of research into globalism and war is to be able to perceive the patterns, identify the weaknesses and vulnerabilities, and then bring the manipulators down, which would finally put us in a position to establish a democratic state in which national wealth is egalitarianly distributed. For the sceptics, Australia was just such a nation from 1948 to 1976; a happy cirsumstance that was ground into free trade oblivion following the US coup d'etet of 1975. Today, 3 million Australians are homeless and 60% live in poverty.
Having commenced my research in 1964, I was able to see what is now hidden to most. From1815, the Rothschilds prospered by lending to both sides in wars they fomented. In 1932, fellow Zionist Nelson Rockefeller suggested a multi-pronged attack. Thus, from 1933 to 1938, he designed the entire United Nations, the HQ of which ended up on his family's land in New York. The Zionists then proceeded to invade sovereign nations under the US flag, plunder their resources, avoid compensation by converting residents into refugees, who then invaded adjoining counties thereby diluting their sentiments of national sovereignty, and creating division and conflict. The US imposed the policy of Multiculturalism to lubricate the process.
Under this multilateral strategy, the US invaded 61 nations and confiscated their human and natural resources, thereby "making the US great". As was shown in a 1969 US study, with 10% of the world's population they consumed 80% of the world's resources. Donald Duck could have made the US great by applying this equation. Donald Trump intends to do the same.
The equation has weaknesses, which are in their application, and that is where a global cell movement has been forming for some decades now and, apparently has already made its first strike. That is all I know about this ultra-secret movement. Globally, according to Jeffrey Sachs, 93% condemn Israel and its US funder. It seems that Wagner-backed Sahel Nations will eventually establish an Africa/South Asia-Pacific/Latin America realm of influence that will, conjoined with BRICS nations, be impermeable to Wall Street/City of London/BIS influence. That is the eventual cause of death of the West, according to Cell pundits.