Those arguing that the establishment is deliberately trying to kill us with SARS-COV-2 and Covid-19 vaccines should avoid commonly used specious "logic" and rely only on proper logic and evidence
John, I appreciate the thoroughness with which you have taken on your skepticism. Nevertheless, your logic is insufficient on any number of points. By the way as a grad student decades ago I used to teach logic. Re: #1 Fauci, By being so specific about the time table for a major infectious disease, it does not PROVE anything, as you correctly point out, but raises some real questions abut what he knew and when he knew it. Further the character of Fauci is further damaged by all that RFK cites in his book and the fact that he funded the Wuhan lab after the moratorium was put in place during the Obama administration. In other words, there is supplemental evidence proving cumulatively that Fauci is a scoundrel of the highest order
What do you say Fauci knew, and when did he know it? Please be specific.
As I note in another reply to one of your comments, proving that Fauci funded the production of a bioweapon (which is evil in its own right) does not prove he did it with the intent of killing Americans. Right?
#2 Fortunately, there were safety features that prevented that accidentally dropped nuclear bomb on North Carolina from exploding (not programmed by impact) so this argument is rather a red herring. No one thinks the intent was to use it effectively on a US state.
#2 The nuclear bomb accidentally dropped on North Carolina. Fortunately, due to safety features, it did not detonate. No one believes the intent was to have it do so, so this is rather a red herring.
#3 VAERS I happened to copy down info that was released about 2 years ago. The annual average of deaths ASSOCIATED with (not proven in each case) from all vaccinations for 30 years (1990 to 2019) was under 200 annually. Yet that number jumped to 4,561 by May of 2021 and has skyrocketed ever since. Further, formal reports to VAERS are vastly UNDER reported, everyone agrees. On a case by case, one can say correlation is not causation, but on this scale that doesn't fly. To deny causation would not be credible, especially among the young and healthy segment of the population, as from our by insurance company actuary reports as well.
#2 Fortunately, there were safety features that prevented the detonation of that accidentally dropped nuclear weapon on North Carolina, and no one thinks that detonation was the intent. So this argument is rather a red herring.
The government produced atom bombs but did not intend to kill Americans with them (as you have shown), right? So it is therefore reasonable to think that when the government produced bioweapons it likewise did not intend to harm Americans with them. Right?
My point is that it is specious to argue that proving the government produced a terrible evil weapon is sufficient to prove that it intended to kill Americans with it.
John, I appreciate the thoroughness with which you have taken on your skepticism. Nevertheless, your logic is insufficient on any number of points. By the way as a grad student decades ago I used to teach logic. Re: #1 Fauci, By being so specific about the time table for a major infectious disease, it does not PROVE anything, as you correctly point out, but raises some real questions abut what he knew and when he knew it. Further the character of Fauci is further damaged by all that RFK cites in his book and the fact that he funded the Wuhan lab after the moratorium was put in place during the Obama administration. In other words, there is supplemental evidence proving cumulatively that Fauci is a scoundrel of the highest order
I myself have written that Fauci is evil: https://www.pdrboston.org/the-real-problem-with-dr-fauci .
What do you say Fauci knew, and when did he know it? Please be specific.
As I note in another reply to one of your comments, proving that Fauci funded the production of a bioweapon (which is evil in its own right) does not prove he did it with the intent of killing Americans. Right?
#2 Fortunately, there were safety features that prevented that accidentally dropped nuclear bomb on North Carolina from exploding (not programmed by impact) so this argument is rather a red herring. No one thinks the intent was to use it effectively on a US state.
#2 The nuclear bomb accidentally dropped on North Carolina. Fortunately, due to safety features, it did not detonate. No one believes the intent was to have it do so, so this is rather a red herring.
#3 VAERS I happened to copy down info that was released about 2 years ago. The annual average of deaths ASSOCIATED with (not proven in each case) from all vaccinations for 30 years (1990 to 2019) was under 200 annually. Yet that number jumped to 4,561 by May of 2021 and has skyrocketed ever since. Further, formal reports to VAERS are vastly UNDER reported, everyone agrees. On a case by case, one can say correlation is not causation, but on this scale that doesn't fly. To deny causation would not be credible, especially among the young and healthy segment of the population, as from our by insurance company actuary reports as well.
Where are these data?
#2 Fortunately, there were safety features that prevented the detonation of that accidentally dropped nuclear weapon on North Carolina, and no one thinks that detonation was the intent. So this argument is rather a red herring.
Why is it a red herring?
The government produced atom bombs but did not intend to kill Americans with them (as you have shown), right? So it is therefore reasonable to think that when the government produced bioweapons it likewise did not intend to harm Americans with them. Right?
My point is that it is specious to argue that proving the government produced a terrible evil weapon is sufficient to prove that it intended to kill Americans with it.