Very glad you are catching up with us John, as many of us have been aware of this collusion for a couple for years.The MAIN person doing this research is Naomi Wolf who has assembled a large team to sift through a couple of tons of Pfizer documents and finding shocking evidence, not merely a smoking gun, as it were,but smoking howitzers, cannons, and missiles. symbolically speaking.
Thanks for pointing out the fact that the five leading authors of the Pfizer study were Pfizer employees and high ranking ones, at that. I don’t claim to be an expert on the Pfizer study which has been reported ad nauseum in the scientific literature as well as in the mainstream media in an obvious effort to herd the world’s population into the corral of “vaccine” injections. It was obvious to me as an MD with board certification in a surgical specialty that the Pfizer trials were specious and deceptive and couldn’t be trusted and were just another part of a dictatorial rollout of dangerous and authoritarian policies including harmful masking, “lockdowns” (lockups?), social distancing, business and school closures, and so on. As far as the studies were concerned the deceptive use of “95% effective”, rather than publicizing the absolute numbers, which were closer to zero percent improvement, were all it took for me to discount the study entirely. Unfortunately the mass media did manage to frighten a very large portion of the population into taking these poisonous injections, and that mistake is now being paid for in spades, even though the actual statistics of increased mortality, disability, and injury from the poisonous shots is being carefully manipulated and/or hidden throughout the world. The carnage is so widespread, however, that most people who are aware of the real, as opposed to fictional, narrative, can see with their own eyes that their circle of social contacts who are injected are suffering and dying in unbelievable numbers and the only plausible explanation is the injections. On a separate note, John, I noted that some of the studies that you were a co-author of had to do with AIDS and funding came from the now-infamous NIAID, headed by Chief Covid injection salesman (murderer), Anthony Fauci. I have only peripherally paid attention to the AIDS story, mainly because I was just too busy in the operating room to be too concerned about its origins, etc. However, with the advent of Covid and all the lies and deception I am beginning to spend some time on trying to understand what AIDS actually was. As I’m sure you know, Luc Montaignier, among other notable scientists involved, declared that HIV did not actually cause AIDS. I haven’t yet read Peter Deusberg’s book, who claimed the same. You seem to have been heavily involved in the AIDS story. Perhaps you can shed some light on this question? Have you read The Perth Group’s paper: https://www.theperthgroup.com/HIV/TPGVirusLikeNoOther.pdf. ? I am part way through this and would be curious to hear your opinion.
When I was working on AIDS clinical trials I tried to determine whether or not Duesberg might be right and ALL my colleagues wrong (it is dangerous to one's career to challenge the prevailing orthodoxy, so I kept low) about the cause of AIDS. I tried using the data that I had from the trials I was involved with, but those data were just not suitable for this purpose. I read a lot of the pro and con articles and came to see that it was like watching a tennis match, one's head would go back and forth, with no final resolution, each paper making a sort of persuasive case against the other.
I have two websites that I edit, and my older one has a page devoted to the debate about the cause of AIDS, at https://newdemocracyworld.org/world_hiv.html . As you can see, some of the links are now dead. But three remain live:
Thanks for the reply, John. Much appreciated and I'll try to get more up to speed on this but if it was difficult for you to figure out when you were in the thick of the battle I doubt I'll be able to find an answer. But one can always try and I'll learn something in the process, I'm sure.
Thanks John. In the UK an Associate Director of the British Medical Journal, Mr Peter Doshi, found that on Pfizer's own initial trial results the efficacy of the Convid 19 vax was 0.84%. Less than 1%. Pfizer later published clarification which showed only a small variation. All for a virus that the UK government said only afected the very old who were already very ill and that 99.9% were unaffected.
Very glad you are catching up with us John, as many of us have been aware of this collusion for a couple for years.The MAIN person doing this research is Naomi Wolf who has assembled a large team to sift through a couple of tons of Pfizer documents and finding shocking evidence, not merely a smoking gun, as it were,but smoking howitzers, cannons, and missiles. symbolically speaking.
Thanks for pointing out the fact that the five leading authors of the Pfizer study were Pfizer employees and high ranking ones, at that. I don’t claim to be an expert on the Pfizer study which has been reported ad nauseum in the scientific literature as well as in the mainstream media in an obvious effort to herd the world’s population into the corral of “vaccine” injections. It was obvious to me as an MD with board certification in a surgical specialty that the Pfizer trials were specious and deceptive and couldn’t be trusted and were just another part of a dictatorial rollout of dangerous and authoritarian policies including harmful masking, “lockdowns” (lockups?), social distancing, business and school closures, and so on. As far as the studies were concerned the deceptive use of “95% effective”, rather than publicizing the absolute numbers, which were closer to zero percent improvement, were all it took for me to discount the study entirely. Unfortunately the mass media did manage to frighten a very large portion of the population into taking these poisonous injections, and that mistake is now being paid for in spades, even though the actual statistics of increased mortality, disability, and injury from the poisonous shots is being carefully manipulated and/or hidden throughout the world. The carnage is so widespread, however, that most people who are aware of the real, as opposed to fictional, narrative, can see with their own eyes that their circle of social contacts who are injected are suffering and dying in unbelievable numbers and the only plausible explanation is the injections. On a separate note, John, I noted that some of the studies that you were a co-author of had to do with AIDS and funding came from the now-infamous NIAID, headed by Chief Covid injection salesman (murderer), Anthony Fauci. I have only peripherally paid attention to the AIDS story, mainly because I was just too busy in the operating room to be too concerned about its origins, etc. However, with the advent of Covid and all the lies and deception I am beginning to spend some time on trying to understand what AIDS actually was. As I’m sure you know, Luc Montaignier, among other notable scientists involved, declared that HIV did not actually cause AIDS. I haven’t yet read Peter Deusberg’s book, who claimed the same. You seem to have been heavily involved in the AIDS story. Perhaps you can shed some light on this question? Have you read The Perth Group’s paper: https://www.theperthgroup.com/HIV/TPGVirusLikeNoOther.pdf. ? I am part way through this and would be curious to hear your opinion.
When I was working on AIDS clinical trials I tried to determine whether or not Duesberg might be right and ALL my colleagues wrong (it is dangerous to one's career to challenge the prevailing orthodoxy, so I kept low) about the cause of AIDS. I tried using the data that I had from the trials I was involved with, but those data were just not suitable for this purpose. I read a lot of the pro and con articles and came to see that it was like watching a tennis match, one's head would go back and forth, with no final resolution, each paper making a sort of persuasive case against the other.
I have two websites that I edit, and my older one has a page devoted to the debate about the cause of AIDS, at https://newdemocracyworld.org/world_hiv.html . As you can see, some of the links are now dead. But three remain live:
1. https://www.duesberg.com/papers/chemical-bases.html
2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4172096/
3. https://www.soa.org/globalassets/assets/library/research/actuarial-research-clearing-house/1978-89/1989/arch-1/arch89v114.pdf .
I'm not sure what really causes AIDS.
But I had a good time fighting the rich with my MD colleagues, as you can read about here: https://newdemocracyworld.org/old/gates1.htm . :)
Thanks for the reply, John. Much appreciated and I'll try to get more up to speed on this but if it was difficult for you to figure out when you were in the thick of the battle I doubt I'll be able to find an answer. But one can always try and I'll learn something in the process, I'm sure.
I just read the report from your last link above. What a great story! Especially that you won! And probably over Kill Gates himself! Congratulations!
Thank you! :)
Thanks John. In the UK an Associate Director of the British Medical Journal, Mr Peter Doshi, found that on Pfizer's own initial trial results the efficacy of the Convid 19 vax was 0.84%. Less than 1%. Pfizer later published clarification which showed only a small variation. All for a virus that the UK government said only afected the very old who were already very ill and that 99.9% were unaffected.