Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chuck Fall's avatar

Excellent post John; I support the Egalitarian cause. The idea of setting a collective intention is critical; and you explain it here, in this post. A revolution will need to take place on multiple levels, but without a clear intention, the end is lost.

Expand full comment
Pseudonymph's avatar

"A third type is the person who angrily says, “You’re a Communist!” Such people are typically people who once lived in the Soviet Union or a Communist nation and (understandably!) mistrust anybody who talks about equality. I tell such people—truthfully!—that I am an Anti-Communist and an Anti-Marxist and an Anti-Socialist because I am for real, not fake, democracy. But ALL of these kinds of people are RARE. That’s what you will discover."

How does that square with saying you want no rich and no poor? That's equity, which is impossible.

You recently wrote a piece stating it was not only okay but basically a moral imperative to literally opress people you and fellow ideologues belive to be "Nazis", because apparently "Nazis [ axiomatically] oppress".

This kind of rational and contempt for people and philosophies you don't like and/or understand is exactly we see play out in judeo-bolshevism :

No actually moral issues with asymmetrical power and abuse thereof, nor moral issues with persecution or oppression - so long as subjectively you agree with it;

It's just a declaration that rather than end such injustices you wish to be in a position to abuse them ans therefore others, rather than be on the receiving end

:/

Did misunderstand anything or was my assessment unfair in any way?

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts