If you haven’t read Dave McGowan’s account of the Boston Marathon false flag you owe it to yourself to do so! It can be found here: https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/
As far as the Charlie Kirk “murder” is concerned. I watched the initial videos that were displayed on the web via main stream and alternative media in which a massive amount of very dark blood literally pours out of Kirk. As a person who spent a career around blood daily it was obvious to me that that was a staged event. All blood, including venous blood, is bright red in a live human being. It was clear that that was a Hollywood fake. Hence, it becomes important to have the patsy’s (if he is a patsy) lawyer convict his/her own client in order to complete the false story of the false flag.
Imo his dissection of the Boston Marathon Bombing was his best work. Through a masterful study of published photos he was able to prove that that at least a major portion of the event was a choreographed event, replete with large numbers of actors. Once anybody read his account they were forever changed as far as accepting mainstream media narratives of public events.
John, When you get time to read McGowan’s epic, please try to remember to let me know your opinion of it. I’d be very interested to hear your thoughts about it. In my own case, once McGowan’s work made it clear that those two Tsaernav boys were completely framed, that the older brother was executed and the younger is only alive because a huge fusillade of bullets fired into the boat in which he was hiding, failed, certainly to the dismay of his captors, to kill him, I realized that the trajectory of this empire was leading straight to unimaginable chaos.
It is strange the lawyer didn't go directly after the bullet and the forensics around that; the crime scene was tampered with, that is captured on film. To your point, the defense lawyer is framing the Charlie Kirk murder as motivated by hatred, but he tries to tamp down the prosecution argument that the event was about hatred, but in an obtuse ineffectual way. Is the defendant still under the MK UlTRA spell, is that why he is seemingly unable to assist his attorney in his defense?
Radical egalitarians should frame Charlie Kirk's "murder" as a hit job by those around him. Implicating Israel is appropriate given he was becoming a critic of the Gaza genocide.
Well... i happen to be a true crime follower.... ( currently watching the Lindsay Clancy trial... and watched from the start, the Bryan Kohlberger trial.. Karen Reed...OJ Simpson....many more....and of course, the Menendez Brothers )... and It has always fascinated me, how the lawyers come up with just about ANYTHNG to win their side. Given this manipulate maneuver that i have seen over and over.... it is completely believable that the same manipulations can enter a courtroom drama.... and yes, even by a Ruling Elite maneuver. This is commonplace, in the courtroom. Ugh. I wish that courts showed only one thing: evidence. But that just about never happens...
Oh, come on, there is footage of a dude giving another dude a weapon at the euthanasia of Kirk. So, what do you want now? Justice in a criminal injustice kangaroo court system?
The Jewish State of Israel --- hmmm -- put out the hit, buddy boy.
Speaking of Jews: Epstein document releases reveal multiple use of the term “goy” or “goyim” in emails, underscoring a worldview that demeaned non-Jews as lesser or exploitable in a network of power and predation. The use of these terms provides a window into the Jewish supremacism of Zionism. But they also show that Jewish supremacism goes much further – and much further back – than an association simply with the Zionist movement.
Yeah, man, what a faux race (s9uic) of people.
In a 2009 email to cognitive psychologist Roger Schank, Epstein wrote about financial schemes: “This is the way the Jew make money … and made a fortune in the past ten years selling short the shipping futures let the goyim deal in the real world.” Black Agenda Report analyses this phrasing as embodying supremacist ideas, positioning Jews as profiting cleverly while relegating “goyim” to lesser labour.
A 2010 exchange with publicist Peggy Siegal concerns a party guest list featuring elites such as Prince Andrew and Woody Allen. Siegal asks if it will be “100% JEW NIGHT,” prompting Epstein’s reply: “No, goyim in abundance — jpmorgan execs brilliant WASPs.” Here, “goyim” marks acceptable non-Jews — brilliant WASPs — as still secondary. Even the Times of Israel in its report of the exchange, notes its disparaging tone.
Epstein passed on a message from a correspondent who accused the intended recipient of behaving “just like the GOYIM you do not respect,” weaponising the term against perceived weakness. Victim Maria Farmer testified that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell routinely called outsiders “goyim” and viewed them as inferior, a pattern these emails confirm.
These references appear repeatedly — over fifty times (though with some duplicates) — including showing Epstein thought ”goyim prosecutors” were incapable of grasping his financial schemes. The Zionist entity’s intelligence links, including Ehud Barak’s involvement, heighten questions of broader supremacist networks.
If you haven’t read Dave McGowan’s account of the Boston Marathon false flag you owe it to yourself to do so! It can be found here: https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/
As far as the Charlie Kirk “murder” is concerned. I watched the initial videos that were displayed on the web via main stream and alternative media in which a massive amount of very dark blood literally pours out of Kirk. As a person who spent a career around blood daily it was obvious to me that that was a staged event. All blood, including venous blood, is bright red in a live human being. It was clear that that was a Hollywood fake. Hence, it becomes important to have the patsy’s (if he is a patsy) lawyer convict his/her own client in order to complete the false story of the false flag.
I loved McGowan’s Waggng the Moonbuggy and his book on Laurel Canyon, but didn’t know he wrote about the Marathon Bombing.
Imo his dissection of the Boston Marathon Bombing was his best work. Through a masterful study of published photos he was able to prove that that at least a major portion of the event was a choreographed event, replete with large numbers of actors. Once anybody read his account they were forever changed as far as accepting mainstream media narratives of public events.
John, When you get time to read McGowan’s epic, please try to remember to let me know your opinion of it. I’d be very interested to hear your thoughts about it. In my own case, once McGowan’s work made it clear that those two Tsaernav boys were completely framed, that the older brother was executed and the younger is only alive because a huge fusillade of bullets fired into the boat in which he was hiding, failed, certainly to the dismay of his captors, to kill him, I realized that the trajectory of this empire was leading straight to unimaginable chaos.
I'll put it on my reading list and try to remember to let you know my thoughts on it.
It is strange the lawyer didn't go directly after the bullet and the forensics around that; the crime scene was tampered with, that is captured on film. To your point, the defense lawyer is framing the Charlie Kirk murder as motivated by hatred, but he tries to tamp down the prosecution argument that the event was about hatred, but in an obtuse ineffectual way. Is the defendant still under the MK UlTRA spell, is that why he is seemingly unable to assist his attorney in his defense?
Radical egalitarians should frame Charlie Kirk's "murder" as a hit job by those around him. Implicating Israel is appropriate given he was becoming a critic of the Gaza genocide.
Will be interesting to see what happens.
Well... i happen to be a true crime follower.... ( currently watching the Lindsay Clancy trial... and watched from the start, the Bryan Kohlberger trial.. Karen Reed...OJ Simpson....many more....and of course, the Menendez Brothers )... and It has always fascinated me, how the lawyers come up with just about ANYTHNG to win their side. Given this manipulate maneuver that i have seen over and over.... it is completely believable that the same manipulations can enter a courtroom drama.... and yes, even by a Ruling Elite maneuver. This is commonplace, in the courtroom. Ugh. I wish that courts showed only one thing: evidence. But that just about never happens...
Yes. And all the more striking, therefore, when a defense lawyer does not even try to refute the prosecutor's assertion.
Oh, come on, there is footage of a dude giving another dude a weapon at the euthanasia of Kirk. So, what do you want now? Justice in a criminal injustice kangaroo court system?
The Jewish State of Israel --- hmmm -- put out the hit, buddy boy.
Speaking of Jews: Epstein document releases reveal multiple use of the term “goy” or “goyim” in emails, underscoring a worldview that demeaned non-Jews as lesser or exploitable in a network of power and predation. The use of these terms provides a window into the Jewish supremacism of Zionism. But they also show that Jewish supremacism goes much further – and much further back – than an association simply with the Zionist movement.
Yeah, man, what a faux race (s9uic) of people.
In a 2009 email to cognitive psychologist Roger Schank, Epstein wrote about financial schemes: “This is the way the Jew make money … and made a fortune in the past ten years selling short the shipping futures let the goyim deal in the real world.” Black Agenda Report analyses this phrasing as embodying supremacist ideas, positioning Jews as profiting cleverly while relegating “goyim” to lesser labour.
A 2010 exchange with publicist Peggy Siegal concerns a party guest list featuring elites such as Prince Andrew and Woody Allen. Siegal asks if it will be “100% JEW NIGHT,” prompting Epstein’s reply: “No, goyim in abundance — jpmorgan execs brilliant WASPs.” Here, “goyim” marks acceptable non-Jews — brilliant WASPs — as still secondary. Even the Times of Israel in its report of the exchange, notes its disparaging tone.
Epstein passed on a message from a correspondent who accused the intended recipient of behaving “just like the GOYIM you do not respect,” weaponising the term against perceived weakness. Victim Maria Farmer testified that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell routinely called outsiders “goyim” and viewed them as inferior, a pattern these emails confirm.
These references appear repeatedly — over fifty times (though with some duplicates) — including showing Epstein thought ”goyim prosecutors” were incapable of grasping his financial schemes. The Zionist entity’s intelligence links, including Ehud Barak’s involvement, heighten questions of broader supremacist networks.